By Nicholas A. Bibby and Matthew T. Bibby
Copyright, all rights
reserved
PART TWO OF TWO
The franchise partnership is not based
on equality and never will be; the king
or queen cannot be faithful to only
one or he/she will perish, and in the
end, the payments are called ROYALITES
aren't they?
It is quite easy to clear up a simple
misconception about franchise marriages.
They don't exist!
Franchising, even if capable of reflecting
some of the nicest parts of marriage
(which it is not), will never qualify
under the definition of true monogamy
and equality. Those enthusiasts who
must insist that franchising can be
a marriage should at least define
this type of marriage as planned,
open and legalized polygamy.
None of this is to say that franchisors
are wolves or that franchisees are
shy, retiring innocents; they are
both necessary ingredients in a potent
formula that will succeed if basic
truths are recognized, accepted and
acted on by both players. It is a
simple fact of life that in order
for franchisors to grow they must
acquire more franchisees. The more
times franchisors enter "quality"
franchise relationships, the more
they win. They are also more experienced
in what they do than the franchisee;
if they were not, there would be no
value in what they offer. The fact
that franchisors and business seekers
need each other to achieve their objectives
does not suggest that any form of
equality must be part of the agreement.
In order for the relationship to last,
there must be fairness and equity,
but equality is a different story.
Franchisees join a "system" created
by a franchisor; they become members.
As such they enjoy certain legal and
operational rights, but they still
must conform. Franchisees can buy
in and then choose to leave, but they
are not the policy makers. Franchisors,
on the other hand, must fulfill their
contractual obligations or they can
loose; not only in court, but in a
much bigger way. Poor franchisor performance
kills future franchise sales through
negative comments issued by existing
franchisees. The bottom line is quite
simple: franchising works when people
understand their roles and fulfill
them.
The truest, and most honest similarity
between franchisors and franchisees
is that they are both in the business
of repetition under the same commercial
symbol. Franchisors repeat the sale
and installation of their system and
franchisees repeat its use. (Franchising,
like every other industry is simply
a production machine that retools
according to the dynamics of supply,
demand and technology.) When that
mechanism is working flawlessly, success
results. Therefore, the most fair
and equitable relationship is one
where franchisors install their system
as promised, and franchisees execute
it as promised. It doesn't have to
be any more complicated than that,
but as human beings we can find a
variety of means to complicate that
which is very simple.
“OK,
if the whole thing is so simple,
why can't franchise relationship
problems be easily overcome?”
|
Like the man said, "Nothing
happens until someone sells
something," and that is the
basis of the problem. Franchising
at its very best means placing
quality people in a quality
business and nurturing the relationship
through quality,
updated, on-going programs
and support systems.
|
When a quality, "proven" franchise
system meets a capable, conscientious
franchisee (with the mental, physical,
emotional and financial resources
required to be successful) the partnership
can succeed. It is the rush to the
alter, or better yet, the lack of
informed decision making on both sides
that leads to so much difficulty.
Certainly deception and unfair play
exists in franchising as it does in
any industry, but the bulk of relationship
problems are due to poor fit between
franchisor, franchisee, and the business
concept that brought them together.
Years ago, while serving as VP of
Franchising for a large international
firm, I thought of the term "profile"
during a training session for the
sales and marketing departments. I
defined the concept as I visualized
it, yet all ears seemed to be hearing
"how can we sell more franchises?"
I understood that, but at the same
time realized that franchise sales
were only going to be as good (long
term) as the person and the system
sold. Today I hear the word "profiling"
tossed around like a baseball, but
with all the lip-service given, I
rarely see it employed as a legitimate
tool for making good choices. Profiling,
fit or matching is not solely the
franchisor's responsibility either;
it is the job of every serious minded
prospective franchisee to perform
not only franchise analysis, but quality
self-analysis. This analysis by the
way is NOT possible through gimmicky
"quick tests" that bait the public
and promise to rate one's entrepreneurial
skill. Neither is the depth of analysis
required available through "free franchise
counseling" services that are designed
to do one thing, talk the client into
buying a franchise and collect a commission.
This is serious, hard work that cannot
be accomplished in a few minutes or
an evening seminar. It can take weeks
or months to arrive at the right conclusions,
but that time is insignificant compared
to the cost of rushed, poor choices
that steal years and thousands of
dollars. There are no "free rides."
We will pay for the knowledge of what
is right and wrong for us in one way
or another; therefore, the most logical
thing to do is invest time on the
front end to minimize future upset.
If a person is interested in quality
franchising either as a franchisee
or as a franchisor, they must adopt
an approach that simply spells out
"fit relationships." How does one
achieve the ultimate? By analyzing
needs and benefits to the extent that
they know what a "fit" means within
a business concept. Having counseled
with so many entrepreneurs over the
years, I know that it is very possible
to reach the right conclusions regarding
"who might be a good business owner,
and who might fit with what system,"
but it is very difficult to convince
people that the process is necessary.
Surprisingly, the same people who
reject the cost of analysis (time
and money) when deciding on their
entrepreneurial path eagerly mortgage
their homes to pay for attorneys when
things don't work out down the road.
(We humans are a stubborn lot.) "Fit"
is the key to franchise relationships,
as it is with every aspect of life.
When franchisors and franchisees reach
the achievable state of knowing who
and what works for them, and then
act on that knowledge, they will enjoy
quality, mature relationships.
Part
One of this series.
Copyright Nicholas A. Bibby and Matthew T. Bibby, all rights reserved.
|