| Copyright Nicholas
A. Bibby, all rights reserved
PART ONE OF TWO
When relationship problems occur,
the first, easiest and most natural thing
for human beings to do is shed personal
blame as quickly as possible. "You
don't..." "You won't..."
"If only you..." and of course,
"I've had enough." Sound familiar?
If you have heard or made these statements
relative to a franchise relationship, you
have experienced one of the worst pitfalls
of the industry and most likely have cast
a jaundiced eye at this struggling adolescent
giant.
Having "lived" franchising for
over 20 years and having experienced it
from virtually every perspective (franchisee,
franchisor, consultant, writer and counselor),
I have witnessed almost every relationship
issue possible within the industry. In addition,
as an adult counselor in the world outside
of franchising, I have also worked with
many individuals as they attempt to understand,
come to grips with, and resolve personal
problems resulting from relationship problems.
The following perspectives on franchise
and business relationships emanate from
my dual experience of counseling individuals
with both business and personal issues.
Quality
relationships (franchised or otherwise)
are built on defined roles, consistent
behavior, trust, honesty, openness,
and support; but most of all, natural
fit. |
Franchise
relationships are as varied in scope
as the 500,000 plus franchise units
counted over the North American landscape,
but most in the industry still fall
back on the word "fault" when
things go awry and attempt to analyze
the problem using a "blame mentality."
Blame does not help resolve relationship
problems, franchised, marital or otherwise. |
This article is written to offer new thoughts for the industry and encourage business leaders, and emerging entrepreneurs alike, to adopt a different perspective. As with most new thinking, a certain amount of flexibility and open-mindedness isrequired in order to move away from traditional
"finger pointing and blame" and
toward concepts based on a clearer understanding
of relationship dynamics and "natural
fit.
"Blame"
has been … the number one justification
for … dismissal from the franchisor’s
kingdom” |
Quality
relationships (franchise or otherwise)
are built on defined roles, consistent
behavior, trust, honesty, openness,
and support; but most of all, natural
fit. When you cut to the chase, factors
that either strengthen or contribute
to the |
dissolution of other interpersonal relationships are the same factors that cause franchise relationships to rise or fall. However, to use traditional one-to-one
relationships as an analogy (a rising trend
in franchising still years ahead of the predominant
blame mentality) is to overlook more important
issues that make more sense for both forming
and categorizing franchise relationships.
COMMON, WORTHLESS "BLAME":
Things aren't working out because of YOU!
"Blame" has been, and continues
to be the number one claim and justification
for hard feelings, thoughts of dismissal
from the kingdom by franchisors, and a call
to arms among disgruntled bands of franchisees
seeking bountiful rewards based on unfair
treatment, poor support and broken promises
both real and imagined. You can read chapters
about real life fighting in most franchise
publications.
For years, "blame" has been recanted
in courtrooms. No doubt there will always
be litigation in franchising, but there
is no need to create relationships that
will most assuredly end in hard feelings,
lost money and lost time.
A
realistic take on most franchise relationships
is: "This is a marriage; I will
love and honor you forever, until
divorce do we part." |
Blame
in a relationship is generally an excuse
for avoiding self-examination. Although
relationship problems are very powerful
signals that both sides have miscued
somewhere along the line, the first
response is blame rather that introspection.
Even when one side wins a dispute (in
or out of court), unless there is thoughtful,
honest self-evaluation, |
the winner still walks away with the odds in favor of repeating the same behavior in the future. There will simply be different characters, times and places. (Why do so many second marriages fail?
Why do so many franchisors continue to battle
over the same issues?) The notion that "winning"
a relationship dispute might mean something
beyond the moment is nonsense unless the winner
gains from the experience and learns "not
to do that again." This may appear to
be simplistic thinking, but simplistic or
not, people choose not to look inward for
one very powerful reason. When we stop blaming
others we have to look at ourselves, but not
too many of us travel willingly to that place.
Blame draws a line in the sand, but it does
not expose the root of a problem. This is
why problems tend to continue.
A realistic take on most franchise relationships
is: "This is a marriage; I will love
and honor you forever, until divorce do
we part."
There are two major players in franchising,
and all that is to be good or bad in the
future hinges on how well they serve each
other. Unfortunately, the franchisee
franchisor relationship always begins with
the parties coming from two totally different
levels of experience, knowledge, insight
and power. From the outset, the
relationship is unequal and always will
be - that's the way the system is designed
to work no matter how much we may want to
tinker with it.
Player 1(A): The New Franchisee.
Consciously, and with near blind trust (in
spite of varying degrees of due diligence),
wide-eyed, prospective franchisees make
a brave decision to enter a new relationship
filled with the expectation that security,
fondness and success will follow and strengthen
the bond for at least the term of the initial
franchise agreement. Their commitment is
time, money, trust and ostensibly hard work
and dedication to a "proven system."
Most often the franchisee approaches the
signing alter with a virginal understanding
of business ownership, P&L responsibility
and real life knowledge of the "chief
cook and bottle washer" method of survival.
The franchisee may have come to believe
the old saw of "in business for yourself,
but not by yourself," but in fact,
franchisees are still business owners and
all the franchise support services in the
world will never equate to on-site, day
to day management responsibility. They are
going to run the gauntlet, but they really
don't know it yet. Most prospective franchisees
have never owned a business and can only
imagine what life in the owner's seat is
truly like. They are simply entrepreneurs
at the first stage of launching forward
who can only hope that they are entering
a well-balanced relationship with an older,
more mature, and experienced partner.
(Note: Of the 2,500, plus or minus, franchise
concepts offered in North America, the words
"only hope" applies in too many
cases. There are however, some stunningly
great franchises that by the nature of their
quality, integrity and well designed systems,
almost guarantee success if the franchisee
fits the mold.)
Player 1(B): The Experienced Franchisee.
Somewhere between the adrenaline rush of
opening day and the close of the first year
of business, franchisees emerge from their
"in-training" mentality and begin
to relax with the "system." These
owners are becoming part of the "cadre"
and for good or bad, the dye of trust has
been cast. With rare exception, these experienced
franchisees are finding it more difficult
to justify writing monthly royalty checks.
Although this "I don't need you anymore"
mentality can exist in any franchise network,
it is predominantly found where royalties
cannot be justified/offset by improvements/programs
or direct provable savings/income from special
purchasing discounts, referrals, etc. While
it is possible to maintain satisfaction
based simply on name recognition, that name
would have to be so powerful as to convince
franchisees constantly that no independent
could draw as well if the franchisor's signs
came down.
(Note: Healthy people will not tolerate
forever an unbalanced relationship. However,
what one person sees as fair, another may
not find tolerable; what one sees as perfectly
satisfactory, another may revolt against.
The point is quite simple. Even if a franchisor
is keeping his promises and can justify
on-going payments through increased trade,
system's improvements, savings, etc., certain
personalities will rebel while other personalities
will happily maintain friendly relationships
over time. A quality franchisee is one who
expects contracts to be fulfilled on both
sides and can see the "real" value
of continuing the relationship. What should
you expect a quality franchisee to say?
"Help me if I need it, but otherwise
leave me alone." Great franchisees
are neither employees nor independent entrepreneurs.
To understand this point is to understand
why perfectly fair systems might be upset
by some franchisees and not upset by others.
When the wrong "type" becomes
a franchisee, there are numerous cures that
fall far short of litigation, but one must
know how to identify brewing problems and
the reasons behind them.)
Player 2: The Franchisor.
Visions of exponential growth and thoughts
of directing a sea of franchisees from the
Captain's bridge capture the imagination
of every franchisor. They might truly enjoy
(and be committed to) teaching, mentoring
and supporting their franchisees, but in
addition, each of them is hoping (and working
hard) to grow their network. Therefore,
consciously and usually without malice,
ambitious franchisors can find themselves
promising the world (emotionally not contractually)
each time they meet an inviting prospect.
Once the sale is made, franchisors understandably
fill themselves with pride that "one
more" has entered the family. Almost
unnoticeably, the stage has been set for
something very different from a traditional
relationship of one-to-one bonding. This
is only the tip of the iceberg in terms
of relational differences and expectations.
Make no mistake; ordinarily franchisors
are not predators greedily snatching up
hapless opportunity seekers. When you consider
that usually more than 100 prospects are
required to make a franchise sale, it is
easy to see that no franchisor could stand
with a frozen, false smile after the initial
stages of franchising, they are just trying
to compete. In fact, selling franchises
is as difficult a task known, if done honestly
and correctly, because the virtue of patience
is worn thin. After the sale it is time
to train and service the new life that "joins
the family." Franchisors may be experts
in the business concept they are franchising,
but the fact that they have begun franchising
does not mean that they are experts in franchising.
This single point makes all the difference
in the world between success and failure
in franchising, but it is a point rarely
examined. In other words, wanting to deliver
and delivering are two different animals.
A critically important issue in franchising
is "people" and the discovery
of "who" as well as "what"
it takes to succeed. Quality selection,
support and mentoring techniques require
franchise insight and experience; one must
shift from employees to franchisees; that
shift is enormous.
PART TWO
Copyright Nicholas
A. Bibby, all rights reserved. |